# Haya design critique

Reviewer:
Date:
Options explored (IDs):

## First impression (before reading the rationale)
What does this product appear to do? What feels distinctive? What feels generic?

## Direction-level notes (repeat for each option)
- Option ID and screen:
- What I noticed:
- Why it matters to a recruiter / hiring manager:
- Keep:
- Change or remove:
- A specific example or annotated screenshot:
- Uncertainty / what needs a real user test:

Optional ratings (1 = weak, 3 = workable, 5 = strong; leave untested blank):
- Distinctive and appropriate identity:
- Clarity of the next action:
- Readability of candidate evidence:
- Comfort for repeated daily use:

## Recommendation
- Strongest foundation (or none):
- One alternative worth testing:
- Elements to borrow across options:
- Three highest-impact changes:
- What evidence would change my recommendation?

These are peer design opinions, not measured usability findings. The seeded
options share a prototype structure; fixtures vary across the two study sets.